Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59621257 →Countries where authors are citing Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development
This map shows the geographic impact of Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development
This network shows the impact of Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development.
About Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development
This paper, published in 2001, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Xuedong Huang, Alex Acero, Hsiao-Wuen Hon and Raj Reddy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (720 citations), Signal Processing (669 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (182 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59621257.