An analysis of time-dependent planning
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Thomas DeanMark Boddy
- Journal
- National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5956802 →Countries where authors are citing An analysis of time-dependent planning
This map shows the geographic impact of An analysis of time-dependent planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An analysis of time-dependent planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An analysis of time-dependent planning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An analysis of time-dependent planning
This network shows the impact of An analysis of time-dependent planning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An analysis of time-dependent planning.
About An analysis of time-dependent planning
This paper, published in 1988, received 489 indexed citations . Written by Thomas Dean and Mark Boddy covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (335 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (160 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (95 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (63 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (52 citations). Published in National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5956802.