Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques
Impact in
- Journal
- Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5935495 →Countries where authors are citing Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques
This network shows the impact of Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques.
About Atmospheric chemistry : fundamentals and experimental techniques
This paper, published in 1986, received 897 indexed citations . Written by Barbara J. Finlayson‐Pitts and James N. Pitts. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (597 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (317 citations), Global and Planetary Change (206 citations), Environmental Engineering (164 citations) and Spectroscopy (96 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5935495.