Multi-view K-means clustering on big data

313 indexed citations
published 2013
Journal
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5921556 →

Countries where authors are citing Multi-view K-means clustering on big data

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Multi-view K-means clustering on big data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multi-view K-means clustering on big data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multi-view K-means clustering on big data more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Multi-view K-means clustering on big data

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Multi-view K-means clustering on big data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multi-view K-means clustering on big data.

About Multi-view K-means clustering on big data

This paper, published in 2013, received 313 indexed citations . Written by Xiao Cai, Feiping Nie and Heng Huang covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (246 citations), Artificial Intelligence (183 citations) and Media Technology (50 citations). Published in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5921556.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026