Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59014615 →Countries where authors are citing Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS
This map shows the geographic impact of Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS
This network shows the impact of Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS.
About Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS
This paper, published in 2001, received 502 indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Hijmans, Luigi Guarino and E. Rojas covering the research area of Genetics and Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (197 citations), Plant Science (171 citations) and Genetics (137 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59014615.