Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata

906 indexed citations
published 1969
Journal
CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w59010687 →

Countries where authors are citing Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata.

About Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata

This paper, published in 1969, received 906 indexed citations . Written by John E. Hopcroft and Jeffrey D. Ullman covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (639 citations), Artificial Intelligence (578 citations) and Molecular Biology (221 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w59010687.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026