COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER
- Authors
- C. AngerJing Hu
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58953518 →Countries where authors are citing COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER
This map shows the geographic impact of COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER more than expected).
Fields of papers citing COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER
This network shows the impact of COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER.
About COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER
This paper, published in 2002, received 3.3k indexed citations . Written by C. Anger and Jing Hu covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.5k citations), Oncology (2.3k citations) and Molecular Biology (943 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58953518.