A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK
- Authors
- Zulkifli Hasan
- Journal
- SSRN Electronic Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5891850 →Countries where authors are citing A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK
This map shows the geographic impact of A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK
This network shows the impact of A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK.
About A Survey on Shari’Ah Governance Practices in Malaysia, GCC Countries and the UK
This paper, published in 2011, received 334 indexed citations . Written by Zulkifli Hasan covering the research area of Education, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (71 citations), Artificial Intelligence (58 citations) and Accounting (51 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5891850.