Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58755692 →Countries where authors are citing Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This map shows the geographic impact of Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This network shows the impact of Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis..
About Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Sune Rubak, Annelli Sandbæk, Torsten Lauritzen and Bo Christensen covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (502 citations), Clinical Psychology (297 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (267 citations). Published in British Journal of General Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58755692.