The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
- Authors
- Nicholas De GenovaNathalie Peutz
- Journal
- Goldsmiths (University of London)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58749329 →Countries where authors are citing The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
This map shows the geographic impact of The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
This network shows the impact of The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement.
About The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
This paper, published in 2010, received 587 indexed citations . Written by Nicholas De Genova and Nathalie Peutz covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (529 citations), Clinical Psychology (170 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (128 citations). Published in Goldsmiths (University of London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58749329.