Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58612684 →Countries where authors are citing Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.
This map shows the geographic impact of Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.
This network shows the impact of Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995..
About Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. 1995.
This paper, published in 1995, received 4.2k indexed citations . Written by Andrew Eaton, Lenore S. Clesceri and Arnold E. Greenberg covering the research area of Water Science and Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Water Science and Technology (1.4k citations), Pollution (1.2k citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (872 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58612684.