[Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58556453 →Countries where authors are citing [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].
This map shows the geographic impact of [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff]. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff]. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].
This network shows the impact of [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff]..
About [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff].
This paper, published in 2005, received 467 indexed citations . Written by Leida M. Lamers, Peep F. M. Stalmeier, Jordan McDonnell, Paul F. M. Krabbe and Jan J.V. Busschbach covering the research area of General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (121 citations), Surgery (111 citations) and Epidemiology (83 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58556453.