Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
Impact in
- Nephrology 247
Classified as
- Authors
- Kyle Ra
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58516573 →Countries where authors are citing Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
This map shows the geographic impact of Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
This network shows the impact of Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases..
About Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
This paper, published in 1995, received 884 indexed citations . Written by Kyle Ra covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (820 citations), Nephrology (247 citations), Genetics (191 citations), Oncology (181 citations) and Epidemiology (169 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58516573.