Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58393990 →Countries where authors are citing Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?
This map shows the geographic impact of Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?
This network shows the impact of Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?.
About Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?
This paper, published in 1984, received 370 indexed citations . Written by Stuart J. Spechler, Alan H. Robbins, Miriam E. Vincent, Timothy Heeren, Wilhelm G. Doos, Theodore Colton and Elihu M. Schimmel covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (353 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (200 citations) and Gastroenterology (137 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58393990.