Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.

524 indexed citations
published 1996

Countries where authors are citing Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective..

About Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective.

This paper, published in 1996, received 524 indexed citations . Written by Curtis D. Hardin and E. Tory Higgins. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (341 citations), Social Psychology (330 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w58125386.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026