The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Ice
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58118223 →Countries where authors are citing The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground
This map shows the geographic impact of The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground
This network shows the impact of The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground.
About The international classification for seasonal snow on the ground
This paper, published in 1990, received 599 indexed citations . Written by Ice covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (554 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (236 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (197 citations), Environmental Engineering (66 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (64 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58118223.