Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.
- Authors
- Hajimu Komada
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w57897632 →Countries where authors are citing Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.
This map shows the geographic impact of Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.
This network shows the impact of Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil..
About Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.
This paper, published in 1975, received 677 indexed citations . Written by Hajimu Komada covering the research area of Plant Science and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (615 citations), Cell Biology (484 citations) and Molecular Biology (75 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w57897632.