Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies

478 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 478 indexed citations. Written by Elizabeth DePoy and Laura N. Gitlin covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Occupational Therapy (159 citations), General Health Professions (119 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations). Published in DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w57844709 →

Countries where authors are citing Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w57844709.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026