Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Authors
- Carla Shedd
- Journal
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w57776195 →Countries where authors are citing Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice
This map shows the geographic impact of Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice
This network shows the impact of Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice.
About Unequal City: Race, Schools, and Perceptions of Injustice
This paper, published in 2015, received 293 indexed citations . Written by Carla Shedd covering the research area of General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (202 citations), Education (166 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). Published in Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w57776195.