Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w57405401 →Countries where authors are citing Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
This map shows the geographic impact of Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
This network shows the impact of Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting.
About Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Keith T. Poole and Howard L. Rosenthal covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Economics and Econometrics (678 citations) and Strategy and Management (557 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w57405401.