Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk

528 indexed citations
published 1980

Impact in

Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w56889009 →

Countries where authors are citing Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk.

About Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk

This paper, published in 1980, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Aldo Perotto and Edward F. Delagi. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (282 citations), Surgery (160 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (130 citations) and Pharmacology (120 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w56889009.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact