A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood.

526 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1991, received 526 indexed citations. Written by Stefano Gustincich, Guidalberto Manfioletti, Giannino Del Sal, C. Schneider and Piero Carninci covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (177 citations), Genetics (116 citations) and Immunology (74 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w56803771 →

Countries where authors are citing A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w56803771.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026