An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.
Impact in
- Pharmacology 341
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w56728344 →Countries where authors are citing An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.
This map shows the geographic impact of An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.
This network shows the impact of An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics..
About An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.
This paper, published in 1959, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Edward Steers, Elwood L. Foltz and Bianca Graves covering the research area of Molecular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Medicine (409 citations), Pharmacology (341 citations), Infectious Diseases (332 citations), Epidemiology (239 citations) and Molecular Biology (200 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w56728344.