Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w56619754 →Countries where authors are citing Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language
This map shows the geographic impact of Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language
This network shows the impact of Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language.
About Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language
This paper, published in 2008, received 279 indexed citations . Written by H. Samy Alim, Awad Ibrahim and Alastair Pennycook covering the research area of Music. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Linguistics and Language (144 citations), Music (100 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (92 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w56619754.