Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya
- Authors
- Mudjia Rahardjo
- Journal
- Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w56397700 →Countries where authors are citing Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya
This map shows the geographic impact of Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya
This network shows the impact of Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya.
About Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya
This paper, published in 2017, received 223 indexed citations . Written by Mudjia Rahardjo covering the research area of Information Systems and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (110 citations), Sociology and Political Science (70 citations) and Information Systems (49 citations). Published in Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w56397700.