Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion

910 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 910 indexed citations. Written by Richard Socher, Danqi Chen, Christopher D. Manning and Andrew Y. Ng covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (829 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (172 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (129 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5632658 →

Countries where authors are citing Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5632658.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026