American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes

540 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1969, received 540 indexed citations. Written by Don Cahalan, Ira H. Cisin and Helen M. Crossley covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (238 citations), Clinical Psychology (107 citations) and Applied Psychology (93 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w56080254 →

Countries where authors are citing American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the American drinking practices : a national study of drinking behavior and attitudes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w56080254.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026