A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River
- Authors
- Aldo LeopoldCharles W. Schwartz
- Journal
- Oxford University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5582904 →Countries where authors are citing A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River
This map shows the geographic impact of A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River
This network shows the impact of A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River.
About A Sand county almanac : with other essays on conservation from Round River
This paper, published in 1966, received 318 indexed citations . Written by Aldo Leopold and Charles W. Schwartz covering the research area of Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (101 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (94 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (80 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5582904.