World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development

643 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 643 indexed citations. Written by Peter Lanjouw, John Besant-Jones, Antonio Estache, Christine Kessides, Lant Pritchett, Ashoka Mody and Gregory K. Ingram covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Media Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (321 citations), Political Science and International Relations (146 citations) and Strategy and Management (140 citations). Published in ULB Institutional Repository.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5540806 →

Countries where authors are citing World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development more than expected).

Fields of papers citing World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5540806.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026