Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction

438 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 438 indexed citations. Written by George Psathas covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (260 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (119 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w55401376 →

Countries where authors are citing Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w55401376.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026