Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w55145848 →Countries where authors are citing Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.
This map shows the geographic impact of Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.
This network shows the impact of Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents..
About Induction of nuclear accumulation of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 by DNA-damaging agents.
This paper, published in 1993, received 691 indexed citations . Written by Michael Fritsche, Christel Haessler and Gerhard Brandner covering the research area of Oncology, Biotechnology and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (499 citations), Molecular Biology (453 citations) and Cancer Research (147 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w55145848.