Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w55082161 →Countries where authors are citing Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.
This network shows the impact of Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review..
About Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review.
This paper, published in 2002, received 625 indexed citations . Written by Roberto D. Pascual‐Marqui, Michaela Esslen, Kieko Kochi and Dietrich Lehmann covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (522 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (111 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w55082161.