Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community

308 indexed citations
published 1991
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w55081503 →

Countries where authors are citing Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community.

About Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community

This paper, published in 1991, received 308 indexed citations . Written by James W. Tollefson covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Linguistics and Language (242 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (172 citations) and Language and Linguistics (152 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w55081503.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026