The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54815698 →Countries where authors are citing The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
This map shows the geographic impact of The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
This network shows the impact of The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review.
About The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
This paper, published in 2007, received 707 indexed citations . Written by Brian A. Nosek, Anthony G. Greenwald and Mahzarin R. Banaji covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (464 citations), Social Psychology (313 citations) and Applied Psychology (148 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54815698.