Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).
Impact in
- Oncology 392
Classified as
- Authors
- Fox Ja
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54815367 →Countries where authors are citing Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).
This map shows the geographic impact of Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin). with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin). more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).
This network shows the impact of Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin)..
About Nonclinical studies addressing the mechanism of action of trastuzumab (Herceptin).
This paper, published in 1999, received 543 indexed citations . Written by Fox Ja covering the research area of Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (392 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (287 citations), Molecular Biology (199 citations), Immunology (72 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (37 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54815367.