Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Joseph A. Califano, Peter van der Riet, William H. Westra, Gary L. Clayman, Steven Piantadosi, Russell L. Corio, Daniel J. Lee, Benjamin Greenberg, Wayne M. Koch and David Sidransky covering the research area of Oncology and Otorhinolaryngology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (478 citations), Oncology (416 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (408 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54777701 →

Countries where authors are citing Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54777701.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026