Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change
- Authors
- Paul Stoneman
- Journal
- Blackwell eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5476860 →Countries where authors are citing Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change
This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change
This network shows the impact of Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change.
About Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Paul Stoneman covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (813 citations), Strategy and Management (464 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (198 citations). Published in Blackwell eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5476860.