The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.
- Authors
- F. D. DeB. HovellF.L. Mould
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54528178 →Countries where authors are citing The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.
This map shows the geographic impact of The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.
This network shows the impact of The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs..
About The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.
This paper, published in 1980, received 506 indexed citations . Written by F. D. DeB. Hovell and F.L. Mould covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Agronomy and Crop Science (446 citations), Genetics (126 citations) and Plant Science (112 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54528178.