Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review

704 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 704 indexed citations. Written by F.D. van der Meer, H.M.A. van der Werff, F.J.A. van Ruitenbeek, C.A. Hecker, W.H. Bakker, M. Noomen, M. van der Meijde, Emmanuel John M. Carranza, J.B. de Smeth and T. Woldai covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Media Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Media Technology (509 citations), Artificial Intelligence (492 citations) and Environmental Engineering (154 citations). Published in ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54384148 →

Countries where authors are citing Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multi - and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing : a review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54384148.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026