The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.

677 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 677 indexed citations. Written by Barbara F. Piper, Suzanne L. Dibble, M. Dodd, Marisa C. Weiss, R.E. Slaughter and Steven M. Paul covering the research area of Sensory Systems and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (353 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (210 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (177 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54358103 →

Countries where authors are citing The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54358103.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026