Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
- Authors
- Nathan Mantel
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54221019 →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration..
About Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
This paper, published in 1966, received 6.6k indexed citations . Written by Nathan Mantel covering the research area of Epidemiology and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (2.0k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.6k citations) and Surgery (1.3k citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54221019.