Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.
- Authors
- Goldie JhColdman Aj
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53974346 →Countries where authors are citing Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.
This network shows the impact of Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy..
About Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.
This paper, published in 1982, received 434 indexed citations . Written by Goldie Jh and Coldman Aj covering the research area of Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (268 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (113 citations) and Molecular Biology (106 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53974346.