Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015

513 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 513 indexed citations. Written by Laurie Linley, Anna Satcher Johnson, Ruiguang Song, Baohua Wu, Sonia Singh, Azfar-e-Alam Siddiqi, Timothy A. Green, H. Irene Hall, Ángela Hernández and Marie S. Morgan covering the research area of Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (397 citations), Epidemiology (278 citations) and General Health Professions (167 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w53824004 →

Countries where authors are citing Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2010–2015.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w53824004.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026