Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach
- Authors
- Hongsheng QiDaizhan Cheng
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53594487 →Countries where authors are citing Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach
This network shows the impact of Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach.
About Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach
This paper, published in 2011, received 777 indexed citations . Written by Hongsheng Qi and Daizhan Cheng covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (577 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (210 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (120 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53594487.