Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum.

493 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 493 indexed citations. Written by Emma Moore, Thomas H. Cogbill, Mark A. Malangoni, H R Champion, Thomas A. Gennarelli, J.W. McAninch, H. Leon Pachter and Peter G. Trafton covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (475 citations), Urology (189 citations) and Emergency Medicine (123 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w53537470 →

Countries where authors are citing Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w53537470.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026