Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.
- Authors
- John S. SprattJohn McKeown
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53344927 →Countries where authors are citing Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.
This network shows the impact of Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy..
About Clinical delivery system for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.
This paper, published in 1980, received 346 indexed citations . Written by John S. Spratt and John McKeown covering the research area of Surgery and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (329 citations), Emergency Medicine (181 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (169 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53344927.