Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks
- Journal
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53273815 →Countries where authors are citing Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks
This map shows the geographic impact of Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks
This network shows the impact of Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks.
About Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Carsten F. Dormann, Bernd Gruber and Jochen Fründ covering the research area of Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (830 citations), Plant Science (541 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (451 citations). Published in GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53273815.