Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture
- Authors
- Charles F. SabelJonathan Zeitlin
- Journal
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53185761 →Countries where authors are citing Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture
This map shows the geographic impact of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture
This network shows the impact of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture.
About Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture
This paper, published in 2010, received 291 indexed citations . Written by Charles F. Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (179 citations), Strategy and Management (93 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (60 citations). Published in UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53185761.