Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown
Impact in
- Philosophy 147
Classified as
- Authors
- Jonathan Z. Smith
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53103620 →Countries where authors are citing Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown
This map shows the geographic impact of Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown
This network shows the impact of Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown.
About Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown
This paper, published in 1982, received 363 indexed citations . Written by Jonathan Z. Smith covering the research area of Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (237 citations), Philosophy (147 citations), Religious studies (72 citations), Anthropology (66 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (61 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53103620.