Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53055458 →Countries where authors are citing Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.
This map shows the geographic impact of Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.
This network shows the impact of Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016..
About Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016.
This paper, published in 2019, received 184 indexed citations . Written by Lauren Harris-Kojetin, Manisha Sengupta, Jessica Lendon, Vincent Rome, Roberto Valverde and Christine Caffrey covering the research area of General Health Professions. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (135 citations), Health (34 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (30 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53055458.